The 5-Second Trick For thesis delay application.case laws in pakistan

The 5-Second Trick For thesis delay application.case laws in pakistan

Blog Article

As being the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be achieved, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Small fees use.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the realized counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession with the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this part for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances with the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may perhaps find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Lots of the volumes (together with more recent volumes than the library's holdings) can also be obtainable online through the Caselaw Access Project.

The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were informed with the boy’s past, they requested if their children were Harmless with him in their home. The therapist assured them that they'd very little to worry about.

We have been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of law and also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed by the Constitution and laws with the United States and this State.

In a few jurisdictions, case regulation could be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.

Will you be looking for Court Information? You can utilize our site to search for your case or search for the person. Information on the site is updated every 24 several hours at 3:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found about the search site is provided for use as reference material and isn't the official court record.

The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The presence of this power casts an obligation around the police, and they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its various pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are needed to protect and not abduct. Read more

The different roles of case regulation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in just how that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale powering their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the broader legal principles.

If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent as well as case under appeal, Possibly overruling the previous case regulation by setting a whole new precedent of higher authority. This could happen several times as being the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first in the High Court of Justice, later of your Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his advancement of the concept of estoppel starting while in the High Trees case.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming read more to your main case, It is additionally a well-proven proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.